California Judge Upholds a Ruling on Gay Marriage

LOS ANGELES — A federal judge on Tuesday upheld the ruling that struck down California’s ban on same-sex marriage , asserting that the judge’s 10-year relationship with another man did not disqualify him from deciding the case. In the court’s decision, Chief Judge James Ware of Federal ...

Related News:-

• Federal Judge Upholds Same-Sex Marriage Ruling in California


Courts Federal Judge Upholds Same-Sex Marriage Ruling in California. Published June 14, 2011 | FoxNews.com

• Judge upholds gay predecessor’s marriage ruling, says jurist had ...


SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge on Tuesday had a message for those trying to salvage California’s gay marriage ban: Sure, the judge who threw out the measure last ...

• California Same-Sex Marriage Ruling Upheld: Court Won't Overturn ...


California Same-Sex Marriage Ruling Upheld: Court Won't Overturn Prop 8 Decision Because Judge Was Gay

• California Judge Upholds a Ruling on Gay Marriage ...


Web Link Send this news item to a Friend Sign-up for Daily News Updates. June 14, 2011. A federal judge on Tuesday upheld the ruling that struck down California's ban on same ...

• California Judge upholds a ruling on gay marriage - Sacramento ...


On Tuesday a California federal judge has ruled that just because the judge shares similar circumstances with the plaintiffs did not mean that he could not ...

• California Judge Upholds a Ruling on Gay Marriage


California Judge Upholds a Ruling on Gay Marriage. LOS ANGELES A federal judge on Tuesday upheld the ruling that struck down Californias ban on same-sex marriage, asserting ...

• Court upholds gay judge's ruling on Proposition 8 - CNN


A federal judge who ruled against a ban on same-sex marriage in California and later revealed that he is gay showed no evidence he was prejudiced in the case ...

• California Judge Upholds a Ruling on Gay Marriage - Page 2 ...


In The News > World News ... Quote: Originally Posted by estesbob I believe this ruling had nothing whatsoever to do with the constitutionality of the original ruling ...